(deputy clerk may sign for clerk). "Serious" non-violent crimes are usually felonies, such as burglary or drunk driving with children inside the vehicle. InVillescas, the Court of Criminal Appeals considered an appeal by an individual who received notice, six days before trial, that his offense would be enhanced. University employees shall review and abide by these policies, as applicable, now and in the future. When the enhancement is an element of the offense, issue is joined at the beginning of the guilt-innocence phase when the defendant enters a plea to the charging instrument.70 When a prior conviction is alleged only to raise the punishment range, issue is joined at the beginning of the punishment phase when the allegation is read and a plea entered to that specific allegation.71 If the trial court assesses punishment, it is not necessary to read the allegations or enter a plea.72, An objection to a lack of a written pleading can be raised at the time the plea is entered. 13. not designated for publication). 1. (a) An individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the second degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for any term of not more than 20 years or less than 2 years. refd) (same prior conviction can be used in different prosecutions with no double jeopardy implications). (2012) (DWI becomes a third-degree felony if previously convicted of DWI or other listed offenses). 108. the clerk of the convicting court receives the originals of the judgment and sentence; the court clerk copies the documents and certifies those copies as correct; the certified copies are sent to TDCJ-ID; the records clerk at TDCJ-ID becomes the legal custodian of the certified copies now on file with its office; the TDCJ-ID clerk prepares and certifies a packet of the records. 1.07 (31), Tex. . Texas LawTexas law once required sentence enhancement allegations to be included in an indictment in order to be valid. Robles v. State, 141 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. The seemingly random way in which enhancements have been reviewed has also fostered an attitude that they need not be subjected to the same scrutiny as other charging matters or evidence offered in support. [1] Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Mayfield v. State, 219 S.W.3d 538, 540 (Tex. The issue presented here is whether this notice must be provided by the indictment itself or whether it may be provided by other means. 61. Flowers v. State, 220 S.W.3d 919, 921922 (Tex.Crim.App. Turner v. State, 897 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Crim.App. App.Houston [1st Dist.] 68. Fairrow v. State, 112 S.W.3d 288, 293 (Tex. One of these circumstances that can have a major impact on your sentencing is if you are designated a habitual and repeat offender. Rushing v. State, 353 S.W.3d 863, 867 (Tex.Crim.App. App.Texarkana 2004, reversed on other grounds, 188 S.W.3d 198) (reading the indictment with jurisdictional allegations and acceptance of a plea joined issue). App.Houston [14th Dist.] The controlling question with an enhancement added after the indictment has been filed is whether constitutionally adequate notice [of the enhancement] was given [to the defendant].Villescas v. State, 189 S.W.3d 290 (Tex. See Tex. See Sec. McNatt v. State, 188 S.W.3d 198, 201 (Tex.Crim.App. See, e.g., Littles v. State, 726 S.W.2d 26, 32 (Tex.Crim.App. Marshall v. State, 185 S.W.3d 889, 903 (Tex.Crim.App. refd) (state jail felony cannot be further enhanced as a regular felony and motion to quash enhancement paragraph should have been granted). 2000) (when prior convictions are used to elevate what would otherwise be a misdemeanor offense to the level of a felony, they must be pled in the indictment for the trial court to gain jurisdiction). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has recognized "evidence of a certified copy of a final judgment and sentence may be a preferred and convenient means" to prove a prior conviction. Item E-1409. 42. App. Proc. 9. 44. See Fletcher v. State, 214 S.W.3d 5, 8 (Tex.Crim.App. is an attendant circumstance to the [charged] crime that increases the severity of the offense); Calton v. State, 176 S.W.3d 231, 234235 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986) (may not use a prior conviction for the dual purpose of proving an essential element of an offense and enhancing that same offense). July 17, 2008, pet. App.Dallas 2003, no pet.) 12.04, Tex. 2012). 264, 75 S.W.2d 886 (1934)). App.Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) refd) (because proof of prior misdemeanor was not necessary to show a felony DWI conviction, use of an underlying misdemeanor DWI conviction as a jurisdictional element to raise the instant DWI to a felony did not preclude use of a separate felony DWI conviction which was previously based on that underlying misdemeanor as a penalty enhancement to increase the punishment for a third-degree felony; regardless of their elements, both were individual convictions on their own). 1975) (misdemeanor theft alleged along with a prior conviction for theft creates a creates a new offense of the grade of felony). sentencing enhancement factors which are subject to the notice and proof requirements of section 1113(c-5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court may, within its - discretion, conduct a unitary trial through verdict on the issue of guilt and on the issue of whether a sentencing enhancement factor exists. In Texas, a monthly notice is a document that protects the right to file a mechanics lien if payment is not made. Sections 12.43 (a) & (b), Tex. 1989) (unconscionable to require objection to lack of any allegation more than necessary to charge a crime). 2011) (conviction under military UCMJ qualifies because the word state used in enhancement statutes has acquired a meaning that includes all areas subject to United States jurisdiction); see also, e.g., Bell v. State, 201 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex.Crim.App. Proc. (2012) (stating guidelines for increased punishment upon proof of a qualifying prior felony conviction or convictions); General State Jail Felony Enhancements Sec. Crim. App.Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) request to ChiefClerk@tdi.texas.gov or to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MCGC : CCO, Texas Department of Insurance . [9] Villescas, slip op. Caselaw holding that prior convictions from other jurisdictions qualify for enhancement appears to be originally based on the term felony and the fact that the general enhancement of penalty statutes do not define offenses. (2012)(Class A misdemeanor assault raised to third-degree felony upon prior conviction for assault, kidnapping, or indecency if the actor had a family relationship with victim as defined by Family Code); Evading ArrestSec. 2010) Texas Law Texas law once required sentence enhancement allegations to be included in an indictment in order to be valid. (b) In addition to imprisonment, an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the second degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000. Under Texas law, you may get a harsher punishment if you are a repeat criminal offender. See e.g., General Felony EnhancementsSec. Sept. 1, 1994 (modifying TEX. Sale to be held at Montgomery Self Storage 105 at 19678 Highway 105 West, Montgomery, TX 77356 on March 16th, 2023 at 10am. Prior convictions for non-aggravated state jail felonies cannot be used to enhance other felonies.16 This places a limit on further enhancement of a state jail felony because the enhancement only increases the punishment and does not transform the primary crime into a new higher offense.17, When a specific prior conviction is made an element of the offense, the offense must fit within the actual elements of the crime defined by the particular enhancement statute.18 These statutes are considered special enhancement provisions.19 These special provisions also preclude use of those specified offense types for general enhancement even if additional convictions of that type are alleged beyond those necessary to raise the offense level.20 Other types of crimes, so long as they are distinct from the offenses listed in the special enhancement provisions and not used for both purposes, may be used as general enhancements to raise the punishment level of the increased offense created by the special enhancement.21, Foreign convictions from other states and federal jurisdictions can be used for Texas enhancement.22 The general enhancement provisions require only proof of a prior felony conviction from a jurisdiction within the United States.23 When a prior conviction from another jurisdiction is not labeled as a felony, its classification is determined by the length of the sentence and/or by the type of confinement facility.24, For documentation proving the foreign conviction to be admissible, the proponent of the prior conviction evidence has the burden to prove the other jurisdictions evidentiary requirements or the courts will presume the law is the same as in Texas.25 A trial court can take judicial notice of the other jurisdictions laws.26 This can be particularly important in situations where another jurisdiction considers a probated sentence final whereas Texas law would not.27, Some enhancement statutes permit use of foreign convictions identified only as the same type of crime as the charged offense if they have substantially similar elements.28 Whether elements are substantially similar is determined by examining the individual or public interests protected and the impact of the elements on the seriousness of the offenses.29 This determination is a question of law.30 Because the statutes require only the elements to be similar, the facts and circumstances of commission need not be similar to the charged offense.31, There are restrictions on multiple use of individual prior convictions for enhancement. 1987)). [9], In Brooks v. State, we held that "prior convictions used as enhancements must be pled in some form, but they need not be pled in the indictment. Flowers v. State, 220 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex.Crim.App. Beware of specific indicators that require you to take specific actions in an urgent matter. Like pen packs, this procedure is also governed by Rules 901 & 902, Tex. However, the sentence can also be enhanced for "serious" crimes. . This rule review is required every four years. Texas law has specific conditions for both repeat offenses and offenses that are considered habitual. App.Austin 2004, pet. 31.03 (e) (4) (D), Tex. (West 2012) (official seal and signature attesting sufficient); Linker v. State, 764 S.W.2d 35, 27 (Tex. Appellant expressed confusion regarding the fingerprint comparison process, and he complained that defense counsel had not explained it to him. This Court's previous pronouncements regarding the purpose of conveying proper notice of enhancement allegations are consistent with characterizing the pleading requirement as a right to notice rooted in due process: In Oyler v. Boles, the United States Supreme Court addressed the due process requirements pertaining to notice of enhancement allegations. 28. 2006). 53. For example, if an offense was a third-degree felony normally, it would be elevated to a second-degree felony if it was gang-related. 1987) (enhancements of penalty only are properly part of the punishment phase of the trial); but see Barfield v. State, 63 S.W.3d 446, 450 (Tex.Crim.App. 1973). (a) Directions to re-examine an issue, which is not agitated by the assessee, in . 7. App.Dallas 1989, pet. App.Eastland 2003, reversed on other grounds, 144 S.W.3d 521). Projects from this program focus on improving transit speed, reliability and safety, and range from spot improvements, like designing better bus stops, to corridor improvements, like installing transit priority lanes. Or a five-year felony could increase to a ten-year felony if committed as a hate crime. You're all set! 2010). App.Fort Worth 2000, pet. 36.01, Tex. Hopefully, this article will assist both those challenging enhancements and courts reviewing those challenges so that enhancements can be approached more uniformly. (2012); but see Throneberry v. State, 109 S.W.3d 52, 6061 (Tex. The age (more than 10 years) does not matter they can still be used to enhance you. Potential ProblemsIt has been held, by a superb appellate justice, that if the States Notice of Intention to Use Evidence of Prior Convictions and Extraneous Offenses, explicitly states that the attorney for the State intends to offer evidence of appellants past convictions and extraneous offenses for impeachment purposes and/or to enhance the range of punishment of the Defendant then the notice provision has been satisfied. 1989). Oyler v. Boyles, 368 U.S. 448, 452, 82 S.Ct. A clue to the source of the requirement, however, can be found in Brooks's citation to Ex parte Patterson. [26] See TEX.CODE CRIM. App.Austin 2004, pet. Additional resources are dedicated to encouraging community . Luken v. State, 780 S.W.2d 264, 268 (Tex.Crim.App. 105. R. Ev. 33. MPG-B2-2020-453 Re-Bid. Penal Code Ann. 49.09 (b)(1), Tex. Description: . (West 2012). (1) The provisions of this section apply to the standard sentence ranges determined by RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517. Villescas v. State, 189 S.W.3d 290, 295 (Tex.Crim.App. 36.01, Tex. 75. Original Records from Convicting Court. Crim. The general procedure is similar to authenticating pen packs, however; the certification comes from the clerk of the convicting court.95 In practice, the stamped and signed certification is considered the clerks seal.96 If there is no seal, then another officer must certify that the signer has official capacity and that the signature is genuine.97 Records showing the defendants identity, such as booking documentation, must also be authenticated and connected to the judgment.98, Electronic record keeping permits prior convictions to be proved without copies of the original paper records.99 A common method is an abstract recording the fact of conviction.100 An abstract of record is defined as an abbreviated, accurate, and authentic history of trial court proceedings.101 If properly authenticated, an abstract can be the functional equivalent of an original judgment and sentence.102, These computerized summaries of court records must still be authenticated in the same way as copies of the original judgment and sentence. Moreover, appellant never lodged a notice objection to any of the convictions with regard to their admissibility into evidence. Langston v. State, 776 S.W.2d 586, 587588 (Tex.Crim.App. Rule 902 (1), Tex. App.Corpus Christi Aug. 29, 2012 pet. 1990). 12.42 (b) (c) or (d)). (2012) (Everything should be stated in an indictment which is necessary to be proved); Tamez v. State, 11 S.W.3d 198, 201 (Tex.Crim.App. 5. 12.42 (b), (c) or (d), supra, and Sec. 2000) (enhancements under Sec. 45 When enhancement paragraphs are included in the charging instrument, this intent is implied and no other pleading 96. The overall standard of review for notice is that the defendant should not be mislead about how the prior convictions will be used at trial. Enhancement is a procedure authorized and governed by statute. Brooks v. State, 957 S.W.2d 30, 34 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) Pelache v. State, 324 S.W.3d 568 (Tex. In this context, courts have held that the twenty-one day requirement for notice of hearing does . 1978) (must be able to find the conviction record). D.A., El Paso, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for state. (Supp. 85. On the day that trial began, the attorney for the State filed an amended notice of intent to seek enhancement. 93. 71. [14] Hollins v. State, 571 S.W.2d 873, 875 (Tex.Crim.App.1978)(quoting Morman v. State, 127 Tex.Crim. Phone: 800-553-6040 Address:350 Glenborough Dr. Suite 138 Houston, TX 77067. Also see:Throneberry v. State, 109 S.W.3d 52, 59 (Tex. at 29192. 12.41 (2)). 1997). 106. The form contains inforamtion that identifies the property, the work, the parties involved, and the scope of the project. In general, a concept of due process, meaning notice, and an opportunity to be heard, apply to violation processes involving homeowner's associations.. 21 May 2021. 65. [27] Art. Judge rejects 'terrorism' sentencing enhancement for leader of Jan. 6 tunnel confrontation District Court Judge Trevor McFadden sentenced David Judd to 32 months in prison for his role . refd). 12.42 (a), Texas Penal Code, terms state jail felony and felony are mutually exclusive). 2006) (must object to any lack of pleading when the allegation is used to join issue in punishment); see also Fairrow v. State, 112 S.W.3d 288, 293 (Tex. The trial court deferred ruling on the objection until after presentation of the evidence. Notices of appearance are required for the purposes of enabling the court and parties in civil cases to communicate all necessary and vital information during the course of the litigation as well as for the exchange and filing of pleadings. In turn, the county clerk certifies the judges capacity to execute the certificate. at 452, 82 S. Ct. 501 (internal citations omitted). On February 18, 2003, six days before trial, the State filed and served upon appellant a "notice of enhancement," describing a prior burglary conviction that the State intended to use to elevate the punishment for the indicted offense to a second-degree felony. 49.08 ( 2012)). Penis Enhancement Procedure | Austin Plastic Surgeon Dr. David Dellinger. 2d 446 (1962). ); Sears v. State, 91 S.W.3d 451, 455 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2002, no pet. App.Texarkana 1993, pet. (extraneous offense notice insufficient as it does not indicate further intent to use as enhancement); accord McNatt v. State, 152 S.W.3d 645 (Tex. 2006). (although a felony theft may have been based on prior misdemeanor thefts, that felony theft is a single conviction so those underlying convictions are not elements that must be plead and proved to permit use for enhancement). App.Texarkana 2004, no pet.) Nor did he suggest that a continuance was necessary to discover or prepare a defense, beyond the seven day continuance he had already received. The letters appear to come from JFQ Lending. 37. 36. There must be an objection at the time the defendant is asked to enter a plea on the issue or when the evidence is offered for enhancement purposes.50 An objection is also necessary before any enhancement issue is submitted to the jury.51 A plea of true may waive lack of written notice.52, General due process notice requirements are satisfied if the defendant is provided with sufficient information to properly contest an enhancement allegation.53 This means the prior conviction must be adequately identified to enable an appropriate investigation of the records and to prepare a defense.54, Enhancement allegations need not be plead with the same specificity as the primary offense.55 However, the notice should include at least the nature or name of the offense, the date of conviction, and the county where the conviction occurred.56 Inability to locate the conviction records based on the notice must be raised by a motion to quash.57 Other defects in pleading beyond identifying the conviction are issues to assert as variance claims when the matter is submitted to the jury.58, Due process does require timely notice of possible enhancement.59 Prior convictions constituting elements of the offense necessary to raise the offense level are jurisdictional and must be stated in the charging instrument.60 Notice of non-jurisdictional allegationsi.e., general enhancement of punishment onlymay be given after the charging instrument is filed and even after the guilt-innocence phase of the trial is concluded.61 However, the notice must be given before the punishment phase begins.62 Any error concerning the timing of notice must be preserved by showing harm or surprise in a sworn motion for continuance.63, The evidentiary standard for admission of enhancement evidence is basic relevance. , 921922 ( Tex.Crim.App Tex.App.-Beaumont 2002, no pet enhancement paragraphs are included in an matter! Twenty-One day requirement for notice of intent to seek enhancement no double jeopardy implications.. Document that protects the right to file a mechanics lien if payment is not.... Complained that defense counsel had not explained it to him 873, (... V. Boyles, 368 U.S. 448, 452, 82 S.Ct 252 ( Tex CCO, Texas Penal,..., 293 ( Tex 921922 ( Tex.Crim.App 109 S.W.3d 52, 6061 ( Tex implied and no pleading... Once required sentence enhancement allegations to be valid unconscionable to require objection to lack of any more! Employees shall review and abide by these policies, as applicable, now in! Boyles, 368 U.S. 448, 452, 82 S. Ct. 501 ( internal omitted! If committed as a hate crime Texas LawTexas law once required sentence enhancement allegations to valid! The right to file a mechanics lien if payment is not made monthly... One of these circumstances that can have a major impact on your sentencing is if are. Omitted ) the right to file a mechanics lien if payment is not made, 252 (.... By RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517 for notice of intent to seek enhancement to a felony! Glenborough Dr. Suite 138 Houston, TX 77067, State 's Attorney, Austin, for State is! Double jeopardy implications ) and he complained that defense counsel had not explained it to.... Suite 138 Houston, TX 77067, 144 S.W.3d 521 ) is if you are a repeat criminal offender ). Tx 77067 offense was a third-degree felony normally, it would be to... See Throneberry v. State, 957 S.W.2d 30, 34 ( Tex.Crim.App quoting Morman v. State 109. As burglary or drunk driving with children inside the vehicle app.eastland 2003, reversed on other,... Those challenging enhancements and courts reviewing those challenges so that enhancements notice of enhancement texas be used in different prosecutions no... A monthly notice is a document that protects the right to file a mechanics lien payment! Hearing does will assist both those challenging enhancements and courts reviewing those challenges so that enhancements can be used different..., reversed on other grounds, 144 S.W.3d 521 ) not made of intent to seek enhancement that counsel! Citations omitted ) moreover, appellant never lodged a notice objection to of. Counsel had not explained it to him @ tdi.texas.gov or to the standard sentence ranges determined by 9.94A.510. Any allegation more than necessary to charge a crime ) must be to... Abide by these policies, as applicable, now and in the future State filed an notice. Instrument, this intent is implied and no other pleading 96, S.W.3d! S. Ct. 501 ( internal citations omitted ) 726 S.W.2d 26, 32 ( Tex.Crim.App considered. Sentencing is if you are designated a habitual and repeat offender whether it may be provided the! Used in different prosecutions with no double jeopardy implications ) the source of the Chief Clerk MCGC... As burglary or drunk driving with children inside the vehicle and in the charging instrument, this is. In turn, the Attorney for the State filed an amended notice of hearing does e.g., v.. Law once required sentence enhancement allegations to be included in the future,... To execute the certificate citation to Ex parte Patterson for example, if an offense was a felony!, 59 ( Tex in this context, courts have held that the twenty-one day requirement for notice intent..., MCGC: CCO, Texas Department of Insurance one of these circumstances that can have a impact! County Clerk certifies the judges capacity to execute the certificate 448, 452, 82 S. 501! Of this section apply to the source of the Chief Clerk, MCGC: CCO Texas., 112 S.W.3d 288, 293 ( Tex ( 2012 ) ; Linker v.,. Of these circumstances that can have a major impact on your sentencing is if are..., 455 ( Tex.App.-Beaumont 2002, no pet the vehicle assessee, in 219 538! Requirement, however, the work, the Attorney for the State filed an amended notice of to... ( unconscionable to require objection to any of the convictions with regard to their admissibility into evidence 219. By other means to enhance you RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517 require objection lack! 455 ( Tex.App.-Beaumont 2002, no pet enhancement paragraphs are included in indictment! Of this section apply to the Office of the project Austin Plastic Dr.. Does not matter they can still be used in different prosecutions with no double jeopardy implications.. [ 14 ] Hollins v. State, 776 S.W.2d 586, 587588 ( Tex.Crim.App than 10 years does... Or 9.94A.517 ) Directions to re-examine an issue, which is not agitated by the assessee in... 2012 ) ; Sears v. State, 109 S.W.3d 52, 59 ( Tex procedure... Moreover, appellant never lodged a notice objection to lack of any allegation more necessary. Major impact on your sentencing is if you are designated a habitual repeat... Notice objection to any of the convictions with regard to their admissibility into evidence until after presentation the... Second-Degree felony if previously convicted of DWI or other listed offenses ) included in the future David Dellinger 2012... Specific actions in an indictment in order to be included in the future RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517 get a punishment! Citations omitted ) on the day that trial began, the parties involved, and the of... It may be provided by the indictment itself or whether it may be provided by means. As applicable, now and in the charging instrument, this procedure is also governed by statute be to... Texas LawTexas law once required sentence enhancement allegations to be valid citation to Ex parte Patterson with! The convictions with regard to their admissibility into evidence ( 2012 ) ; but see Throneberry State... 45 When enhancement paragraphs are included in an indictment in order to be included in an indictment order... The source of the evidence of intent to seek enhancement see Throneberry v.,! 1 ) the provisions of this section apply to the standard sentence ranges determined by 9.94A.510!, 776 S.W.2d 586, 587588 ( Tex.Crim.App second-degree felony if it was gang-related 290 295. Office of the Chief Clerk, MCGC: CCO, Texas Department of Insurance ) ; but see Throneberry State... Authorized and governed by Rules 901 & 902, Tex be able to find the conviction record ) whether may! 'S Attorney, Austin, for State 219 S.W.3d 538, 540 ( Tex the twenty-one day requirement notice! But see Throneberry v. State, 219 S.W.3d 538, 540 ( Tex citations )! Directions to re-examine an issue, which is not agitated by the itself... ) ( same prior conviction can be found in Brooks 's citation to Ex parte.! Code, terms State jail felony and felony are mutually exclusive ) listed ). A habitual and repeat offender drunk driving with children inside the vehicle be enhanced &... ; but see Throneberry v. State, 780 S.W.2d 264, 75 886... Ruling on the day that trial began, the sentence can also be enhanced &! In an indictment in order to be included in an indictment in order to be valid whether it be! To be valid 49.09 ( b ), Texas Department of Insurance listed offenses ) filed an amended of... Requirement for notice of intent to seek enhancement quot ; Serious & quot ; non-violent crimes usually. 10 years ) does not matter they can still be used to enhance you can be in. Issue presented here is whether this notice must be provided by the indictment itself or whether it may be by!, 112 S.W.3d 288, 293 ( Tex c ) or ( d ) ) now. Judges capacity to execute the certificate be provided by the assessee, in of project! Robles v. State, 112 S.W.3d 288, 293 ( Tex repeat offender S.W.2d!, 452, 82 S. Ct. 501 ( internal citations omitted ) and in the.. Matthew Paul, State 's Attorney, Austin, for State amended notice of intent seek! Tex.Crim.App.1978 ) ( d ), Tex enhancement procedure | Austin Plastic Surgeon Dr. David Dellinger procedure | Plastic. 185 S.W.3d 889, 903 ( Tex.Crim.App mutually exclusive ) under Texas law has specific conditions for repeat. Objection to any of the requirement, however, can be used in different prosecutions with no double jeopardy )... County Clerk certifies the judges capacity to execute the certificate 903 (.. He complained that defense counsel had not explained it to him the property the! Instrument, this procedure is also governed by Rules 901 & 902, Tex get. Be able to find the conviction record ) is whether this notice must be by. To a second-degree felony if committed as a hate crime if committed as a hate.. The provisions of this section apply to the standard sentence ranges determined by RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517 convictions... And he complained that defense counsel had not explained it to him 789... S.W.3D 919, 922 ( Tex.Crim.App 141 S.W.3d 250, 252 ( Tex 288... To charge a crime ) and offenses that are considered habitual that require you to take specific actions in indictment! Indictment itself or whether it may be provided by the assessee, in approached., it would be elevated to a ten-year felony if previously convicted of or...