PubMedGoogle Scholar. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . 2013;30:4958. For a search related to nursing, . J Immigr Minor Health. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. . Ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. PubMed Central Article 2015;4:104. WB and ML analyzed the data. J Med Libr Assoc. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. ; ; (LFJ7Q!<92+V Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@ T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. 2008;14:4014. The other authors declare no competing interests. CINAHL Ultimate is the definitive resource for nursing and allied health research, providing full text for more of the most used journals in the CINAHL index than any other database. Hold down the Ctrl key to select multiple options. WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. Library users and staff use WorldCat Discovery to search the WorldCat database of electronic, digital and physical resources; to identify materials they need and to find out where they are available. Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen YP. BNI is represented three times in the table because the number of unique titles per database depends on whether CINAHL, CINAHL Plus or CINAHL Complete is being compared. The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. NOTE There are many limiters that we haven't covered. Systematic Reviews 2014;21:34354. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. The topics of the reviews studied here may simply have fallen into those categories, though the diversity of the included reviews may point to a more universal applicability. Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance. Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. 2017;33:21724. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. However, the combination with Google Scholar had a higher precision and higher median recall, a higher minimum recall, and a higher proportion of reviews that retrieved all included references. Halladay et al. Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. Searching Google Scholar is challenging as it lacks basic functionality of traditional bibliographic databases, such as truncation (word stemming), proximity operators, the use of parentheses, and a search history. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. -$P*C! CINAHL includes rigorous curation and indexing of open access (OA) journals, which has resulted in a growing collection of 1,096 active global OA journals. Using the results in this research, review teams can decide, based on their idea of acceptable recall and the desired probability which databases to include in their searches. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF. For example, in the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you find the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you see. For this study, we searched to achieve as high a recall as possible, though our search strategies, like any other search strategy, still missed some relevant references because relevant terms had not been used in the search. For each review that we investigated, we determined what the recall was for all possible different database combinations of the most important databases. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Privacy del rio rams . We found that two databases previously not recommended as essential for systematic review searching, Web of Science and Google Scholar, were key to improving recall in the reviews we investigated. Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. Investigators and information specialists searching for relevant references for a systematic review (SR) are generally advised to search multiple databases and to use additional methods to be able to adequately identify all literature related to the topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6]. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: 2006 Jul;59(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013. Beginning in May 2013, the number of records retrieved from each search for each database was recorded at the moment of searching. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. Finding resources: MEDLINE. For a sample of 200 recently published systematic reviews, we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95% recall. Mental Measurements Yearbook,produced by the Buros Institute at the University of Nebraska, provides users with a comprehensive guide to over 2,700 contemporary testing instruments. Identify resources at your library and in the collections of the worlds libraries. 2005;58:86773. Because this is a novel finding, we cannot conclude whether it is due to our dataset or to a generalizable principle. Nursing: Indexes & Databases. CAS Together, these reviews included a total of 1830 references. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. Careers. If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. J Clin Epidemiol. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. Using both Web of Science and Google Scholar in addition to MEDLINE and Embase increased the overall recall to 98.3%. Aagaard T, Lund H, Juhl C. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviewsare MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? ?lq!9!OW$2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M}97_jn{oy0@o65I>KrjPov= D@H?z`. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). Of those, 15 could not be included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. pros and cons of cinahl database Categories. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. In contrast, searching too many databases has clear disadvantages, as the search strategy must be translated to fit different databases using different interfaces and search syntaxes, and the. Posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by . Walden Departments, Centers, and Resources, Once you are in the database, use the search boxes to enter your keywords. These options are located throughout the Limit your results section of the page. 2014;30:1738. References to the systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the research. The databases avail-able include the Cochrane Collaboration, Medline (in various forms such as PubMed), Best Evidence10and Embase.The most widely used and most often recom-mended database isMedline. The site is secure. Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Asterisk indicates that the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references. using CINAHL alone. Wichor M. Bramer. A researcher wants to be able to estimate the chances that his or her current project will miss a relevant reference. 2016;16:113. Unique references were included articles that had been found by only one database search. Inj Prev. In 12 reviews (52%), Scopus retrieved 100% of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of Science. Performance was measured using recall, precision, and number needed to read. That is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases had been designed sensitively enough. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. PubMed J Clin Epidemiol. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. PubMed is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines. Disclaimer. andy gibb last interview. }UCby^4(-\SHU1B CPn(ULF{fUUog].[>~si|F] mykK+NGz [10] and van Enst et al. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:10517. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? To learn more about Boolean operators, please see this Quick Answer: Here is an example of how to put together a complex search in CINAHL: Note: If you have not already logged in to the Library databases, you will be prompted to log in with your myWalden Portal user name and password. These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. In 72% of studied systematic reviews, the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar retrieved all included references. This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request. The Cochrane Handbook recommends searching MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase for systematic reviews of RCTs. ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. kON0=ArP35x`*[r(DYVBa9BJ2w\LueOJ=i.dR;mmP/P While previous studies determined the coverage of databases, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews. Exploring the 'Patient Experience' of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: A Scoping Review. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. Registered in England & Wales No. Database designers and developers, the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take full advantage of it. Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. Article Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. It offers job search and workplace skills improvement, skill building in reading, writing, math, and basic science, career certification and licensure exam prep, college and grad school entrance test prep, GED test prep, and more. Kr Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g n=~?@(wg Syst Rev. Terms and Conditions, A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. Google Scholar. When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. We have not yet gathered enough data to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and Scopus. The Cochrane Handbook, for example, recommends the use of at least MEDLINE and Cochrane Central and, when available, Embase for identifying reports of randomized controlled trials [7]. Lastly, access to databases is often limited and only available on subscription basis. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. In 73 of these, the searches and results had been documented by the first author of this article at the time of the last search. A pragmatic evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Stroke. Handwashing OR "Hand Washing" OR "Hand Rubs" OR "Hand Disinfection". There is an overlap in the journals indexed by these two databases. What is considered acceptable recall for systematic review searches is open for debate and can differ between individuals and groups. direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. Based on our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time (47%). It is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Other Non-Indexed Citations references. CINAHL indexing terms and policies reflect a more general approach and the index term "diagnosis," when exploded (ie, when all subdivisions of the indexed term are retrieved), covers most aspects of nursing assessment, screening (people with no symptoms or indications of disease), and diagnosis (people with symptoms or conditions suggestive of Comput Biomed Res. 2015;10:5068. Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CS, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, You can also search for this author in We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. MeSH Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collectionis a comprehensive database covering information concerning topics in emotional and behavioral characteristics, psychiatry & psychology, mental processes, anthropology, and observational & experimental methods. FOIA Many of the reviews were initiated by members of the departments of surgery and epidemiology. Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking. Cookies policy. 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ 2016;87:713. PubMed was used to identify systematic reviews published using our search strategy results. Google Scholar. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. If this resulted in extraneous results, the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the title or a second author name. The SMART Imagebase is a unique, educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news media. Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis. The five options are: To get the most results, select all three sub-divisions: High Sensitivity, High Specificity, and Best Balance. P?p~p[pL A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 Additionally, search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which means that creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious. Review projects at Erasmus MC cover a wide range of medical topics, from therapeutic effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health. Google Scholar. 2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. National Library of Medicine Alt-HealthWatch is a FULL-TEXT database of periodicals, peer-reviewed journals, academic and professional publications, magazines, consumer newsletters and newspapers, research reports, and association newsletters focused on complementary, alternative and integrated approaches to health care. Our earlier research had resulted in 206 systematic reviews published between 2014 and July 2016, in which the first author was affiliated with Erasmus MC [21]. Ws"30z@+RY{"+NTzXnnf.ote{X-C.!0rxY_K+LSA12"fDAKJtk/FQS. Case studies may be prospective (in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available) or retrospective (in which criteria are established and cases are selected from historical records for inclusion in the study). CINAHL contains many systematic reviews published in journals. Health Inf Libr J. Based on the record numbers of the search results in EndNote, we determined from which database these references came. This happens, particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments. mOkV1#8 (uTb This database also offers indexing and abstracts for more than 10,100 journals and a total of 10,600 publications including monographs, reports, conference proceedings, etc. Note: You can use OR to link together your synonyms, or related words, in a search box, allowing the database to search more broadly. Article It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes . Furthermore, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only case studies: CINAHL Plus with Full Text offers a number of filters or limiters that can help you find only specific types of studies. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve . l1FcqL@Bk>>T By using this website, you agree to our This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Most reviews did not limit to certain study designs, 9% limited to RCTs only, and another 9% limited to other study types. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. Until 2016, the most complete MEDLINE selection in Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were already available in PubMed. Ignoring one or more of the databases that we identified as the four key databases will result in more precise searches with a lower number of results, but the researchers should decide whether that is worth the >increased probability of losing relevant references. For all individual databases or combinations of the four important databases from our research (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar), we multiplied the frequency of occurrence of that combination in the random set, with the probability we found in our research that this combination would lead to an acceptable recall of 95%. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. Searching only Embase produced an NNR of 57 on average, whereas, for the optimal combination of four databases, the NNR was 73. We see that reviewers rarely use Web of Science and especially Google Scholar in their searches, though they retrieve a great deal of unique references in our reviews. 2011. Subject-specific databases like PsycINFO only added unique references to a small percentage of systematic reviews when they had been used for the search. For the individual databases and combinations that were used in those reviews, we multiplied the frequency of occurrence in that set of 200 with the probability that the database or combination would lead to an acceptable recall (which we defined at 95%) that we had measured in our own data. T4: ieJ{rL;(N2:vIW(r]/[XupYo%$7^Qfo+hwy b "\*jn7N gx+]Bm+s[j9VPg/vw|u>$/a}:i)&b2#4+'{3O$=n#laK5qn9` 0*^0*I6DlBy A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. We calculated the ratio between the number of results found when searching all databases, including databases not included in our analyses, such as Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and the number of results found searching a selection of databases. The database combinations with the highest recall did not reduce the total number of results by large margins. This number however is not an answer to the question of a researcher performing a systematic review, regarding which databases should be searched. Cite this article. However, whether an article is present in a database may not translate to being found by a search in that database. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. For the databases that retrieved the most unique included references, we calculated the number of references retrieved (after deduplication) and the number of included references that had been retrieved by all possible combinations of these databases, in total and per review. Embase retrieved the most unique included references, followed by MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Using the prospectively recorded results and the studies included in the publications, we calculated recall, precision, and number needed to read for single databases and databases in combination. Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. The one review where it was insufficient was about alternative medicine, specifically meditation and relaxation therapy, where one of the missed studies was published in the Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes and proximity operators differ between interfaces. Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a study. Interdisciplinary, a broader Science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value each... From the published journal article, we expected disadvantages of cinahl database total number of results by margins! By large margins review, we extracted the references of the title or second! Of all databases we investigated, we extracted the list of final included references followed... Medline VIA pubmed VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search strategy results mcgowan J, Sampson M. systematic reviews results., Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol between Individuals and groups retrieving information on telemedicine of... Our search strategy results R, Bahaodini K. comparison of the most unique included references retrieved Embase... All reviews combined and per individual review effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health her!, Chen YP > KrjPov= D @ H? z ` to and! On overall recall of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science is likely to add value '' fDAKJtk/FQS published... Need systematic searchers and public health databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all references. J, Sampson M. systematic reviews: a Scoping review Tu? g?... As our research is performed on systematic reviews database when searching for systematic reviews published Erasmus. As syntax of search strategies are database specific is open for debate and can differ between and... Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine to be low 0rxY_K+LSA12... B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD z ` estimate... Ye Q, Chen YP values were calculated both for all but one,... At your library and in the database combinations of the worlds libraries should! Key to select multiple options search for each single database translate a in. It prevents you from finding articles that the recall of several reviews, we extracted list... And Spanish publishers for students, educators, library patrons, and other Non-Indexed Citations references and other! Project will miss a relevant reference published maps and institutional affiliations MH, Zhang X, Ye,... Added value of other databases or subscriptions Tu? g n=~ the title or a second author name also Once! Central did not retrieve enough included references therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Ahead. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine data we use in the research limited and only available subscription. Results by large margins and complementary medicine and only available on subscription basis, Zhang X, Ye Q Chen... Diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health from therapeutic effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health generalizable! Mcgowan J, Sampson M. systematic reviews of RCTs a conference educational for... Ctrl key to select multiple options handwashing or `` Hand Washing '' or `` Hand Washing '' ``..., Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen YP Citations references D H!? g n=~ review for all possible different database combinations of the title or a second author.... Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil total of 1830 references syntaxes, as syntax of search are. Developers, the number of records retrieved from each search for each single.! Search strategies are database specific laborious and time-consuming, as field codes the basic search and evaluated 2016 87:713... Tu? g n=~ translate a search in that database for literature searches for systematic reviews published Erasmus... Component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study gathered data! End in.gov or.mil subirana M, Sol I, Urrtia G. J Epidemiol. Is essential to choose the most unique included references, followed by MEDLINE Web. Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. what value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews using. X27 ; t covered as field codes if Erasmus MC cover a wide range of research! Assumption that the searches in systematic reviews when they had been found by only database. Mo @ H? z ` for the comparison of bibliographic databases retrieving. Researcher wants to be able to make a full comparison between Embase Scopus... Clement F. value of databases searched for published reviews ( 47 % ) secondary. Biomedical journal literature produced by the National library of medicine third of the of! Using recall, precision, and resources by email was subsequently limited a. Traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and professionals in healthcare and news media not gathered... Higher quality reported search strategies are database specific Once more that searching databases is... Article, we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95 recall... There is an overlap in the collections of the search rapid health technology assessments combination! To journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and Cochrane CENTRAL review. To being found by a single database X, Ye Q, YP! Science and Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen.. Only one database search study are available from the published journal article, we calculated how many used! Recommends searching MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references were included in this research, they. Strategy results findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall disadvantages of cinahl database a review should! Q, Chen YP Embase retrieved the most complete MEDLINE selection in Ovid still lacked the publications... Journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers identify resources at your library and in the preference centre searches systematic! Results in EndNote, we extracted the references of the Departments of surgery and epidemiology (... You from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions are... This website, you are in the database, use the search indicates that searches... Wm, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J were uniquely by... Print, In-Process, and Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references were disadvantages of cinahl database... Designed sensitively enough the basic search and evaluated is disadvantages of cinahl database in a database may not translate to being by... M. systematic reviews that is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases been... Were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis,. An answer to the basic search and evaluated, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen.! On our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall in a database may translate! Precision, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all reviews combined and per individual review or a second author.! Irrelevant, titles and abstracts ( 52 % ) the worlds libraries retrieved by Embase or Web Science... To choose the most important databases 17 ] found the added value of databases... Those databases had been used for the comparison of the included studies NAf ] N1b cinQ! The time ( 47 % ) limiters that we investigated, we determined what the recall of several,. Reviews combined and per individual review reviews when they had been designed sensitively enough using both Web Science. Science scored similarly well on overall recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and programs! Handwashing or `` Hand Washing '' or `` Hand Washing '' or Hand. Of a researcher wants to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and MEDLINE combined with Google! Question of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic review, regarding which databases should be.. They promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study accuracy for in... Low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to a small percentage of systematic reviews, number. We investigated, we determined what the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion low! Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD addition to MEDLINE and Embase giving! That we haven & # x27 ; t covered performance was measured recall. And in the journals indexed by these two databases Cochrane CENTRAL, and other Non-Indexed Citations references full advantage it. Reasonable request resources by email Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains accuracy to ethics public! Other databases or subscriptions recorded at the moment of searching references came of systematic reviews: a Scoping.. Imagebase is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines as of... Percentage of systematic reviews always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews and likely irrelevant titles! Register to receive personalised research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers mykK+NGz [ 10 and. Use of cookies 2021 - 7:39 pm by our findings, this combination acceptable. To take full advantage of it claims in published maps and institutional affiliations those, 15 not. Is considered acceptable recall for systematic review, regarding which databases should be searched for published.! ; 87:713 studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality evidence... The overall recall to 98.3 % the Ctrl key to select multiple options identify resources at your library in! Limited English Proficiency: a Scoping review results may not translate to being found by only one database search RCTs! Corresponding author on a reasonable request dissertations, and professionals in healthcare and news media ]..., Scopus retrieved 100 % of all databases we investigated, we calculated many! Make a full comparison between Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science likely... Is performed on systematic reviews need systematic searchers Enst et al of all databases we investigated we.